The MP behind the assisted dying bill believes that having experts sign off on cases would strengthen the law rather than relying solely on a judge.
Kim Leadbeater, the Labour MP proposing the bill, suggests replacing the requirement for a High Court judge to check eligibility with a panel of experts overseeing applications.
This change comes after concerns were raised about the court’s capacity to handle each case individually.
Leadbeater believes that adding “extra expertise” would enhance the bill, although some critics consider it as weakening the safeguards.
Conservative MP Danny Kruger, a vocal critic of the bill, welcomes the idea of involving more experts in the process but questions their impartiality compared to a judge.
Leadbeater defends the panel of experts as professionals doing a professional job, emphasizing that the bill prioritizes choice for terminally ill individuals.
If approved, the bill would allow terminally ill adults expected to die within six months to seek help in ending their own lives.
The latest proposal will be voted on by a committee of MPs examining the bill, most of whom support the legislation.
The committee is currently reviewing the bill line by line.
Under Leadbeater’s proposal, a panel chaired by a senior legal figure and consisting of experts like psychiatrists would review each application, with the option for High Court review if necessary.
A Voluntary Assisted Dying Commission, led by a High Court judge or senior former judge, would select the panels and oversee all cases.
The commission would report annually on the number of applications received and their outcomes.
Leadbeater argues that the bill maintains judicial scrutiny but evolves into a “judge plus” model, aiming to strengthen the legislation.
The committee has been gathering evidence from experts and considering proposed amendments to the bill.
Retired High Court judge Sir Nicholas Mostyn expressed doubts about the High Court’s capacity to handle all assisted dying cases, suggesting a panel of experts instead.
Leadbeater agrees on the need for other professionals to be involved in the assessment process.
The bill, currently under scrutiny by MPs, aims to provide choice to terminally ill individuals facing unbearable suffering.
The bill will be debated further by the House of Commons and Lords and requires approval from both chambers to become law.